Re: Can Postgresql be ported to a device with no OS and simple file I/O and memory management?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Walter Vaughan <wvaughan(at)steelerubber(dot)com>
Cc: Pg general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can Postgresql be ported to a device with no OS and simple file I/O and memory management?
Date: 2007-04-19 20:11:37
Message-ID: 4627CCF9.1090108@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Walter Vaughan wrote:
> Raymond Hurst wrote:
>
>> I have a requirement of incorporating a database in a hard disk drive.
>
> Well, back in the day there was a man called Dick Pick. The US Goverment
> had the same request. They wanted a database incorporated into a hard
> disk drive, and that's what they got. An operating system and database
> in one, on the hard drive. Damn good database, still in use all over the
> world. IBM even distributes 2 versions today.

That takes me back - hours of endless fun trying to get tape drives to
work with native Advanced Pick - and it wasn't a great deal better on
the 'alongside HP-UX' version. So much easier when Unidata came along
and didn't try to be an OS as well as a DBMS.... Ahh, those were the
days :-)

Regards, Dave.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anton Melser 2007-04-19 20:29:19 Re: recommendations for reducing mem usage on local dev machine
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-04-19 20:09:49 Re: Download source