From: | "Tarcizio Bini" <tarcizioab(at)c3sl(dot)ufpr(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Query Optimization with Kruskal’s Algorithm |
Date: | 2008-05-07 16:28:04 |
Message-ID: | 461a87490805070928h14226615hb87bf2574e26f330@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hello friends,
I'm working on optimizing queries using the Kruskal algorithm (
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4318118) I did several
tests in the database itself and saw interesting results.
I did 10 executions with each query using unchanged source of Postgres and
then adapted to the algorithm of Kruskal.
The query I used is composed of 12 tables and 11 joins.
Results Postgresql unchanged (ms): (\ timing)
170,690
168,214
182,832
166,172
174,466
167,143
167,287
172,891
170,452
165,665
average=> 170,5812 ms
Results of Postgresql with the Kruskal algorithm (ms): (\ timing)
520,590
13,533
8,410
5,162
5,543
4,999
9,871
4,984
5,010
8,883
average=> 58,6985 ms
As you can see the result, using the Kruskal algorithm, the first query
takes more time to return results. This does not occur when using the
original source of Postgres.
So how is the best method to conduct the tests? I take into consideration
the average of 10 executions or just the first one?
Do you think I must clean the cache after each query? (because the other (9)
executions may have information in memory).
regards, Tarcizio Bini.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Smith | 2008-05-07 20:02:57 | Backup/Restore of single table in multi TB database |
Previous Message | Dennis Muhlestein | 2008-05-07 15:36:55 | Re: Possible Redundancy/Performance Solution |