| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Arrays of Complex Types |
| Date: | 2007-04-09 01:53:46 |
| Message-ID: | 46199CAA.9000406@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Based on this, I withdraw my efficiency concern about generating
> rowtypes for all user tables. I do, however, still object to generating
> them for system tables. In particular an array type for pg_statistic
> will actively Not Work and probably constitute a security hole, because
> of the "anyarray" hack we use there.
>
>
How would we do that? Not create the array types in bootstrap mode? Or
just special-case pg_statistic?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2007-04-09 02:20:43 | Re: Bitmap index thoughts (another segfault) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-09 00:41:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Arrays of Complex Types |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-09 02:24:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Arrays of Complex Types |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-04-09 01:46:42 | Re: Correct the spelling of SYMMETRIC |