Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory

From: Mark Shuttleworth <mark(at)ubuntu(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Martin Pitt <martin(dot)pitt(at)ubuntu(dot)com>, Stuart Bishop <stuart(dot)bishop(at)canonical(dot)com>
Subject: Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory
Date: 2007-04-05 09:22:15
Message-ID: 4614BFC7.9090103@ubuntu.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> (1) something (still not sure what --- Martin and Mark, I'd really like
> to know) was issuing random SIGTERMs to various postgres processes
> including autovacuum.
>

This may be a misfeature in our test harness - I'll ask Stuart Bishop to
comment.

Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2007-04-05 09:31:15 Re: Checkpoint gets stuck in mdsync
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-04-05 09:11:34 Checkpoint gets stuck in mdsync