| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Auto Partitioning |
| Date: | 2007-04-04 14:07:39 |
| Message-ID: | 4613B12B.8050805@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> My hope is to have a mechanism to partition indexes or recognise that
> they are partitioned, so that a set of provably-distinct unique indexes
> can provide the exact same functionlity as a single large unique index,
> just without the management nightmare.
>
>
Will this address the fairly common data design problem where we need to
ensure that a given value is unique across several tables (possibly
siblings, possibly not)? If so, then full steam ahead.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2007-04-04 14:15:49 | Re: xpath_array with namespaces support |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-04-04 14:03:51 | Re: Auto Partitioning |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2007-04-04 14:15:49 | Re: xpath_array with namespaces support |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-04-04 14:03:51 | Re: Auto Partitioning |