Re: Oracle indemnifies PostgreSQL on its patents

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Luke Lonergan wrote:
>> Bruce,
>>
>> This is big news - has anyone checked to see if the agreement for the
>> OIN is
>> in perpetuity? Or is their agreement to not pursue patents only for
>> as long
>> as they are members?
>>
>>
> I'm sure they would be estopped from enforcing a patent against someone
> who relied on the assurance while they were a member, so I doubt this
> distinction matters. Otherwise it becomes worthless.

Either way, we should consider, not considering that this is actually
news. Let us not be enticed by the opportunity that likely has strings
attached.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/