Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch queue concern

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch queue concern
Date: 2007-03-28 21:43:56
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>> Perhaps it makes sense to say:
>> Feature Freeze: April 1st., no "new" patches accepted for 8.3
>> Patch Freeze April 15th., Authors have until the 15th to address any 
>> committer concerns
> Well, I am OK with that, but we need _community_ agreement on that.
> I realize it isn't fair that committers are behind on patches, while we
> are expecting submitters to make the deadline, but there are far fewer
> committers than submitters, and there was never a promise to commit
> everything before feature freeze.

Yeah that was kind of my thinking is that everyone knows that the 
committers are behind (and overworked). So if we have this two week 
breather where it is all about patch review...

Joshua D. Drake


       === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
PostgreSQL Replication:

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeremy DrakeDate: 2007-03-28 22:19:37
Subject: Re: Patch queue concern
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-03-28 21:40:56
Subject: Re: Patch queue concern

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group