Re: Patch queue concern

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch queue concern
Date: 2007-03-28 21:43:56
Message-ID: 460AE19C.90308@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>
>> Perhaps it makes sense to say:
>>
>> Feature Freeze: April 1st., no "new" patches accepted for 8.3
>> Patch Freeze April 15th., Authors have until the 15th to address any
>> committer concerns
>
> Well, I am OK with that, but we need _community_ agreement on that.
>
> I realize it isn't fair that committers are behind on patches, while we
> are expecting submitters to make the deadline, but there are far fewer
> committers than submitters, and there was never a promise to commit
> everything before feature freeze.

Yeah that was kind of my thinking is that everyone knows that the
committers are behind (and overworked). So if we have this two week
breather where it is all about patch review...

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Drake 2007-03-28 22:19:37 Re: Patch queue concern
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-03-28 21:40:56 Re: Patch queue concern