Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]

From: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Date: 2025-09-01 05:12:11
Message-ID: 4607.1756703531@localhost
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I started an attempt to make a "lightweight" MVCC-safe prototype and
> stuck into the "it is not working" issue.
> After some debugging I realized Antonin's variant (catalog-mode based)
> seems to be broken also...
>
> And after a few more hours I realized non-MVCC is broken as well :)
>
> This is a patch with a test to reproduce the issue related to repack +
> concurrent modifications.
> Seems like some updates may be lost.
>
> I hope the patch logic is clear - but feel free to ask if not.

Are you sure the test is complete? I see no occurrence of the REPACK command
in it.

--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2025-09-01 05:19:41 Re: Update outdated references to SLRU ControlLock
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-09-01 05:09:13 Re: List TAP test files in makefiles