Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes
Date: 2007-03-19 10:16:56
Message-ID: 45FE6318.8080204@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2007, at 10:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> You'll obviously need to run it with the patch applied. I'd suggest to
>> enable stats_block_level to see the effect on buffer cache hit/miss
>> ratio.
>
> groupeditems-42-pghead.patch.gz is enough, or it needs
> maintain_cluster_order_v5.patch ??

No, it won't make a difference unless you're inserting to the table, and
the inserts are not in cluster order.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2007-03-19 10:27:32 Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ?)
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-03-19 10:09:03 Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_class attributes and race conditions ?)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-19 17:43:28 Re: suggestion for improving TMPDIR and "--format" docs for pg_dump
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-03-19 08:48:19 Re: ecpg threading vs win32