Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs
Date: 2007-03-13 19:10:50
Message-ID: 45F6F73A.7050203@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Does this not seem a problem to you?
>
> No. 8.2 is case-insensitive on timezone names, but prior releases were not.
> I believe the difference you're seeing in 8.1 is that 'PST8PDT' binds to
> the zic database entry by that name, while 'pst8pdt' falls back on the
> POSIX-default rules, which are presumably still the old DST law.

Well in my test case, I explicitly note that PST8PDT != 'PST8PDT' .

That is my actual concern. Before DST it wasn't an issue, now it is. Is
that PostgreSQL's problem? Probably not, but it certainly seems
inconsistent.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-13 19:18:39 Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-13 18:55:14 Re: 8.1.x (tested 8.1.8) timezone bugs