Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics

From: Galy Lee <lee(dot)galy(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics
Date: 2007-03-09 00:42:32
Message-ID: 45F0AD78.9030501@oss.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I don't have anything else as detailed as a "plan". If you have
> suggestions, I'm all ears.
Cool, thanks for the update. :) We also have some new ideas on the
improvement of autovacuum now. I will raise it up later.

> Now regarding your restartable vacuum work.
> Does this make sense?
I also have reached a similar conclusion now. Thank you.

Regards
Galy

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Edward Stanley 2007-03-09 01:34:38 My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties
Previous Message Umar Farooq Minhas 2007-03-09 00:01:17 Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch