From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: OT: Canadian Tax Database |
Date: | 2007-03-08 13:53:37 |
Message-ID: | 45F01561.7020101@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
>> http://www.thestar.com/News/article/189175
>>
>> "For instance, in some cases the field for the social insurance number
>> was instead filled in with a birth date."
>>
>> Unbelievable. Sixty years of electronic computing, fifty years use in
>> business and the "professionals" who built the tax system for a
>> wealthy democratic country didn't use data types.
>
> This is Unbelievable? This is commonplace.
I need to start adding 10% on my fees for things like "use of types".
I would put some foreign-key constraints in my current project, but I
don't think the client can afford it ;-)
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ted Byers | 2007-03-08 14:15:03 | Re: OT: Canadian Tax Database |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-03-08 13:00:19 | Re: OT: Canadian Tax Database |