| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] WITH/RECURSIVE plans |
| Date: | 2007-03-08 01:09:26 |
| Message-ID: | 45EF6246.70906@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
>> Any chance we can get WITH without RECURSIVE? That would be very
>> handy all by itself.
>>
>
> I thought Greg already did submitted that?
>
To my knowledge, it is not done. If it is, great!
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brent Wood | 2007-03-08 01:43:05 | Re: How to force planner to use GiST index? |
| Previous Message | Reece Hart | 2007-03-08 00:52:59 | pg_restore and database comments |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shane Ambler | 2007-03-08 01:30:59 | Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-03-08 01:01:51 | Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes |