| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannes Dorbath <light(at)theendofthetunnel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Shiva Sarna <shiva(dot)sarna(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: supporting 2000 simultaneous connections. |
| Date: | 2007-03-01 16:26:34 |
| Message-ID: | 45E6FEBA.5000506@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hannes Dorbath wrote:
> On 28.02.2007 07:15, Shiva Sarna wrote:
>> The client want us to support 2000 simultaneous users. My question is
>> will there be any performance degradation if I increase the
>> max_connections of pgsql to 2000.
>
> Consider using a connection pool..
But to answer the question, it entirely depends on your hardware. I
wouldn't try this with less than 16Gig of ram and 4-8 cores.
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik Jones | 2007-03-01 16:27:07 | Re: Why does "group by" need to match select fields? |
| Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2007-03-01 16:24:53 | Re: Can I getting a unique ID from a select |