Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS
Date: 2007-02-25 00:39:48
Message-ID: 45E0DAD4.9090106@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Browne wrote:
> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, kawasima(at)cs(dot)tsukuba(dot)ac(dot)jp (Hideyuki Kawashima) wrote:
>> I appreciate your great suggestion!
>> It is great honor for me if Sigres will be merged to PostgreSQL.
>> Since the changes of Sigres from PostgreSQL-8.2.1 are not many,
>> and moreover, all of changes are surrounded with #ifdef SIGRES --- #endif,
>> incorporating Sigres into PostgreSQL would be easy.
>
> You should consider submitting a patch for this against CVS HEAD.
>
> And actually, I'd think it a better idea to define a GUC variable and
> use that to control whether Sigres is active or not.
>
> At the more sophisticated end of the spectrum, you might set things up
> so that it could be activated/deactivated at runtime by a superuser.
>
> At the less sophisticated end, it might need to be configured in
> postgresql.conf...

Whatever happen with this?

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Warren Turkal 2007-02-25 00:42:41 Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question)
Previous Message Chad Wagner 2007-02-24 23:51:55 Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question)