From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS |
Date: | 2007-02-25 00:39:48 |
Message-ID: | 45E0DAD4.9090106@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Browne wrote:
> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, kawasima(at)cs(dot)tsukuba(dot)ac(dot)jp (Hideyuki Kawashima) wrote:
>> I appreciate your great suggestion!
>> It is great honor for me if Sigres will be merged to PostgreSQL.
>> Since the changes of Sigres from PostgreSQL-8.2.1 are not many,
>> and moreover, all of changes are surrounded with #ifdef SIGRES --- #endif,
>> incorporating Sigres into PostgreSQL would be easy.
>
> You should consider submitting a patch for this against CVS HEAD.
>
> And actually, I'd think it a better idea to define a GUC variable and
> use that to control whether Sigres is active or not.
>
> At the more sophisticated end of the spectrum, you might set things up
> so that it could be activated/deactivated at runtime by a superuser.
>
> At the less sophisticated end, it might need to be configured in
> postgresql.conf...
Whatever happen with this?
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Warren Turkal | 2007-02-25 00:42:41 | Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question) |
Previous Message | Chad Wagner | 2007-02-24 23:51:55 | Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question) |