Re: slow update on 1M rows (worse with indexes)

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: gabriel(dot)biberian(at)beemotechnologie(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: slow update on 1M rows (worse with indexes)
Date: 2007-02-22 18:42:39
Message-ID: 45DDE41F.6090907@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

n i tried adding an index to the table on the column date (int) that
> stores unix timestamps.
> TOTO=# CREATE INDEX versions_index ON versions_9d (date);
> (-60M) disk space goes down on index creation
> beebox(at)evobrik01:~$ time psql TOTO -c "UPDATE versions_9d SET flag=9"
> UPDATE 976009
> real 3m8.219s (+328M)
> beebox(at)evobrik01:~$ time psql TOTO -c "UPDATE versions_9d SET flag=8"
> UPDATE 976009
> real 6m24.716s (+326M)
> beebox(at)evobrik01:~$ time psql TOTO -c "UPDATE versions_9d SET flag=10"
> UPDATE 976009
> real 8m25.274s (+321M)
>
> As a sanity check, i loaded mysql5 and tried the same database and
> updates. With mysql, the update always lasts ~8s.

Yes but with mysql did you use myisam or innodb?

> The conclusions I have come to is that update==insert+delete which seems
> very heavy when index are present (and heavy disk wise on big tables).
> Is there a switch i can flip to optimise this?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Gabriel Biberian
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barbara Cosentino 2007-02-22 20:19:50 Vacuum full very slow due to nonremovable dead rows...What makes the dead rows non-removable?
Previous Message Steinar H. Gunderson 2007-02-22 18:25:00 Re: slow update on 1M rows (worse with indexes)