Re: Column storage positions

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: Phil Currier <pcurrier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Column storage positions
Date: 2007-02-22 17:33:14
Message-ID: 45DDD3DA.5040305@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
>
> Yes, that was the idea (not oid but some number), and I am arguing
> against it. Imho people are used to see the logical position in e.g.
> pg_index
>
>
>

Which people are you talking about? In my commercial PG work I hardly
ever look at a system table at all, and users shouldn't have to IMNSHO.
If you mean tools developers, then accomodating to catalog changes is
par for the course, I should think.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-02-22 17:35:06 Re: SCMS question
Previous Message Warren Turkal 2007-02-22 17:30:12 Re: SCMS question