Re: Union Query Improvement

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Union Query Improvement
Date: 2007-02-14 07:29:23
Message-ID: 45D2BA53.2010100@cox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/13/07 07:46, Ray Bannon wrote:
> I have a query which is running a bit slowly, and I'm wondering if anyone
> has a design improvement. Basically it's a series of unions as follows:
>
> Select ID, plan_name from table/view
> Where plan_name = 'A'
> And rownum = 1
> UNION
> Select ID, plan_name from table/view
> Where plan_name = 'B'
> And rownum = 1
> UNION
> Select ID, plan_name from table/view
> Where plan_name = 'C'
> And rownum = 1
> UNION
>
> Ad infinitum for about 100 iterations.
>
> Any way to write this more efficiently?

Just out of curiosity: why does your(?) design have 100 tables/views
with the same (or almost identical) structure?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF0rpTS9HxQb37XmcRAtH5AJ4zz5NPM5rBsNWLrKC+/Md6GhxCNgCfZBHf
AeMbTRNKp4guK81pGwfU5wc=
=t9y+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris 2007-02-14 07:33:27 Re: Proper escaping for char(3) string, or PHP at fault, or me at fault?
Previous Message Chris 2007-02-14 07:29:12 Re: Slony Replication problem