Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Richard Troy <rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp
Date: 2007-02-09 06:24:08
Message-ID: 45CC1388.3040206@ejurka.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Richard Troy wrote:

> It'd be great if Jan considers the blending of replication; any given DB
> instance shouldn't be only a master/originator or only a slave/subscriber.
> A solution that lets you blend replication strategies in a single db is,
> from my point of view, very important.
>

Perhaps if more people read Jan's posts he wouldn't be so frustrated.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-01/msg01302.php

He clearly describes that the master/slave setting is per session, not
per database.

Kris Jurka

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message RaviKumar.Mandala 2007-02-09 07:15:07 Database backup mechanism
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2007-02-09 06:04:13 Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp