Re: Dead code in _bt_split?

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dead code in _bt_split?
Date: 2007-02-06 10:28:45
Message-ID: 45C8585D.9090703@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Heikki, did this code cleanup get included in your recent btree split
>>> fix?
>> No.
>
> OK, would you please send a patch to remove the unused code. Thanks.

Ok, here you are.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
deadcode_in_split.patch text/x-patch 1.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2007-02-06 10:33:24 Re: Pl/pgsql functions causing crashes in 8.2.2
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-02-06 10:14:45 Re: Proposed adjustments in MaxTupleSizeandtoastthresholds

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-06 14:56:23 Re: Dead code in _bt_split?
Previous Message Chris Marcellino 2007-02-06 10:03:46 Feature: POSIX Shared memory support