| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, me(at)oisinglynn(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches |
| Date: | 2007-02-02 18:53:34 |
| Message-ID: | 45C388AE.4010602@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>> Also, three just seems like a sensible number to maintain. I kinda
>>> like Magnus' idea to put older releases into a sort of 'retired' mode
>>> though, and build only the binaries for PostgreSQL itself.
>> The other option would be for one or more Windows users to step forward
>> and say "I'll package 8.0 if I get some help".
>>
> Or in case one of the PostgreSQL support companies actually have
> customers running this that needs it, they could do it.
I doubt we have any customers running it.
> Obviously edb
> doesn't feel the need, since Dave's not been ordered to :-)
I'm left to my own devices as far as community work is concerned. Which
is nice :-)
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-02-02 18:54:46 | Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-02-02 18:47:32 | Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches |