| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Any Plans for cross database queries on the same server? |
| Date: | 2007-01-30 21:45:28 |
| Message-ID: | 45BFBC78.1080709@cox.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/30/07 15:55, Richard Troy wrote:
>> On 01/30/07 14:41, Tony Caduto wrote:
>>> Mark Walker wrote:
[snip]
> These days with good open source choices, things are a bit
> different, but that doesn't mean it's always good to go hog wild
> with any particular tool set just because you can. Sometimes
> people over-use engine-side features, forgetting that there are
> nearly always more cycles available on clients than servers...
Call me Dinosaur Ron, but I think that CICS and the 3270 terminal
were a pair of the best IT inventions ever. With them, a modern
system can support 10s of thousands of concurrent online users.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFv7x4S9HxQb37XmcRAk6dAJ0UoeQSOIajiw/BXdbTeJ53VHWuIwCghpc+
X4RYf7W8kWrmZ1V9vlkvFgE=
=uKXe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rich Shepard | 2007-01-30 21:52:10 | Re: DBMS Engines and Performance |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-01-30 21:36:19 | Re: Can a function be parameter in PL/PGSQL function? |