From: | Cosimo Streppone <cosimo(at)streppone(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | Postgresql Performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: int4 vs varchar to store ip addr |
Date: | 2007-01-29 16:44:13 |
Message-ID: | 45BE245D.3040006@streppone.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Nicolas wrote:
> I have an authorization table that associates 1 customer IP to a service
> IP to determine a TTL (used by a radius server).
>
> table auth
> client varchar(15);
> service varchar(15);
> ttl int4;
> client and service are both ip addr.
>
> The number of distinct clients can be rather large (say around 4
> million) and the number of distinct service around 1000.
>
> there's a double index on ( client , service ).
It comes to mind another solution... I don't know if it is better or worse,
but you could give it a try.
Store IP addresses as 4 distinct columns, like the following:
CREATE TABLE auth (
client_ip1 shortint,
client_ip2 shortint,
client_ip3 shortint,
client_ip4 shortint,
service varchar(15),
ttl int4,
);
And then index by client_ip4/3/2/1, then service.
CREATE INDEX auth_i1 ON auth (client_ip4, client_ip3, client_ip2, client_ip1);
or:
CREATE INDEX auth_i1 ON auth (client_ip4, client_ip3, client_ip2, client_ip1, service);
I'm curious to know from pg internals experts if this could be a
valid idea or is totally non-sense.
Probably the builtin ip4 type is better suited for these tasks?
--
Cosimo
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Carlos Moreno | 2007-01-29 19:47:46 | Re: [OT] Very strange postgresql behaviour |
Previous Message | Florian Weimer | 2007-01-29 16:26:42 | Re: int4 vs varchar to store ip addr |