Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL
Date: 2007-01-27 18:51:17
Message-ID: 45BB9F25.8020809@cox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/27/07 11:50, Bill Moran wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
[snip]
> Of course, the end of "official" support for a project doesn't prevent folks
> with an interest from continuing to support it unofficially. The CVS
> tree will still be there, etc.
>
> Anyway, just my thoughts on the matter. It's interesting to see the other
> discussion that's going on.

The Debian Security Team will be patching security issues on v7.4
for another 18 months, if that helps anyone.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFu58lS9HxQb37XmcRAmYkAKCC+SMLzaph6Pby2/M1BGqCbounkgCcDYgd
jkrBZF9CZdZO9q0G92mTqss=
=vs5m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Schmidt 2007-01-28 01:26:45 Password issue revisited
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2007-01-27 18:35:06 Re: Stats collector frozen?