| From: | "Meredith L(dot) Patterson" <mlp(at)thesmartpolitenerd(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Questions for Meredith |
| Date: | 2007-01-16 05:40:09 |
| Message-ID: | 45AC6539.7090200@thesmartpolitenerd.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | sfpug |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> BTW, I took up Dejector with one of the Derby engineers. He said that, since
> they are JDBC-only, 80% of the queries run against Derby are properly
> PREPAREd ... making Dejector not particularly critical for Derby.
That's probably just as well, since I wasn't exactly looking forward to
learning a Java-based parser generator (which would probably be more
appropriate than SWIG/JNI).
BTW, Rob and I discussed your question #5, regarding embedding Dejector
into a driver to handle known-insecure applications. I think we have a
solution, but it hinges on the apps in question connecting to the db via
a dedicated user, then determining a most likely exemplar using the
composition technique you suggested.
More later; this combination of being swamped with work and probably
coming down with something has not left me with a lot of time for this
project, but I haven't forgotten. :(
--mlp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-01-16 16:00:36 | Re: Questions for Meredith |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-01-16 03:26:23 | Re: Questions for Meredith |