| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dumpall default database |
| Date: | 2007-01-15 21:14:44 |
| Message-ID: | 45ABEEC4.1030209@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 17:07 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
>> You're thinking the user might expect it dump all of that database? Not
>> sure I agree with that, but I'm not wedded to the syntax. Any other
>> opinions?
>
> I agree with Peter: specifying the database name as implemented seems
> like it would be prone to confusion.
OK, updated patch attached. This has
-E <dbname> or --default-database=<dbname>
Regards, Dave.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pg_dumpall_default_database2.diff | text/plain | 5.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-01-15 21:22:19 | Re: Autovacuum improvements |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-15 20:42:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum improvements |