Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Patrick Earl <patearl(at)patearl(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
Date: 2007-01-12 17:08:31
Message-ID: 45A7C08F.90309@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Actually, it could still be the same problem, with the AV software only
>>> involved to the extent that it's trying to scan files for viruses.
>
>> Partially the same, but I've seen AV software keeping it open for
>> hours... Basically until reboot.
>
> Well, the bug report that just went by proves there's another problem:
>
> : select version();
> :
> : "PostgreSQL 8.2.1 on i686-pc-mingw32, compiled by GCC gcc.exe (GCC)
> : 3.4.2 (mingw-special)"
> :
> : pg_log:
> :
> : 2007-01-12 17:23:16 PANIC: could not open control file
> : "global/pg_control": Permission denied
>
> pg_control is certainly not ever deleted or renamed, and in fact I
> believe there's an LWLock enforcing that only one PG process at a time
> is even touching it. So we need another theory to explain this one :-(
> ... anyone have a better one than "Windows is a piece of junk"?

Right. What we need is a list of which processes have handles open to
the file, which can be dumped using Process Explorer (there are other
sysinternals tools to do it as well, but PE is probably the easiest)-

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-12 17:22:27 Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
Previous Message Stéphane Schildknecht 2007-01-12 16:50:51 FK Constraint on index not PK

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-12 17:22:27 Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-01-12 17:08:20 Re: ideas for auto-processing patches