Re: -f <output file> option for pg_dumpall

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: -f <output file> option for pg_dumpall
Date: 2007-01-05 17:40:20
Message-ID: 459E8D84.10708@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page wrote:
> In pgAdmin we use pg_dump's -f option to write backup files. The IO
> streams are redirected to display status and errors etc. in the GUI.
>
> In order to enhance the interface to allow backup of entire clusters as
> well as role and tablespace definitions, we need to be able to get
> pg_dumpall to write it's output directly to a file in the same way,
> because we cannot redirect the child pg_dump IO streams (which also
> means we may miss errors, but I need to think about that some more).
>
> As far as I can see, adding a -f option to pg_dumpall should be straight
> forward, the only issue being that we'd need to pass pg_dump an
> additional (undocumented?) option to tell it to append to the output
> file instead of writing it as normal.
>
> Any thoughts or better ideas?
>
>

This seems a bit like piecemeal reform. Here are some things I'd like to
see that affect this area:

. merge pg_dump and pg_dumpall (e.g. add a flag to pg_dump that says do
the lot)
. multi-db non-text dumps

And while we're about it, can we teach pg_restore to handle text dumps?
Even if it just transparently called psql it would be nice.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darcy Buskermolen 2007-01-05 17:47:19 Re: -f <output file> option for pg_dumpall
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-01-05 17:35:03 Re: -f <output file> option for pg_dumpall