| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
| Date: | 2007-01-04 14:09:18 |
| Message-ID: | 459D0A8E.1090409@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list
> and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists?
>
AIUI, the hold list is those patches providing new features that were
held over between 8.2 feature freeze and 8.2 branch. Since they have
been around for a while I think they have some claim to priority. The
other list is just the normal running list of such patches that Bruce keeps.
> There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show
> up on either list.
That also happens. The only way I can see of ensuring it does not happen
would be to auto-process all patch submissions.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bill Moran | 2007-01-04 14:18:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-01-04 12:40:54 | Tabs or Spaces |