Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing handling

From: Roman Kononov <kononov195-pgsql(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing handling
Date: 2006-12-27 23:47:05
Message-ID: 459305F9.1060403@yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On 12/27/2006 05:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Roman Kononov <kononov195-pgsql(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
>> On 12/27/2006 03:23 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Are you sure? As I remember, computation automatically upgrades to
>>> 'double'. See this program and output:
>
>> This is platform- and compiler- dependent:
>
> ... and probably irrelevant, too. We should store the result into a
> float4 variable and then test for isinf() on that; that eliminates the
> question of whether the compiler did the multiply in a wider format or
> not.

You are right provided that you want to ignore underflows and silently
produce zeros instead.

If you go this way, I recommend to ignore overflows as well, and silently
produce infinities and NaNs.

Roman

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-12-28 00:11:55 Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type
Previous Message David Fetter 2006-12-27 23:40:58 Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2006-12-28 01:11:52 Re: Load distributed checkpoint
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-27 23:26:47 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing handling of underflows,