Re: Autovacuum Improvements

From: Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com>
To: Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum Improvements
Date: 2006-12-19 22:09:10
Message-ID: 45886306.1040009@nwlink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Erik Jones wrote:
> Matthew O'Connor wrote:
>> Glen Parker wrote:
>>> If it isn't there somewhere already, I would ask to add:
>>> Expose a very easy way to discover autovacuum's opinion about a
>>> particular table, for example "table_needs_vacuum(oid)", ignoring any
>>> time constraints that may be in place.
>>
>> This might be a nice feature however in the presence of the much
>> talked about but not yet developed maintenance window concept, I'm not
>> sure how this should work. That is, during business hours the table
>> doesn't need vacuuming, but it will when the evening maintenance
>> window opens up.
>
> Well, what he's saying is, "Not taking into account any time/maintenance
> windows, does this table need vacuuming?"

Correct. IOW, "does it need it?", not "would you actually do it at this
time?"...

-Glen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glen Parker 2006-12-19 22:11:41 Re: Autovacuum Improvements
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-19 21:57:24 Re: Autovacuum Improvements

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-19 22:09:20 Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-12-19 22:08:47 Re: effective_cache_size vs units