From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
Date: | 2005-10-17 12:42:34 |
Message-ID: | 4583a049b477c2362d68dca2430b803a@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> I don't think that PostgreSQL is really on Oracle's radar at the moment.
Please don't make this assumption. PostgreSQL is *very* much on their radar,
and probably represents the biggest long-term threat to their core database
business at the moment. We got a hint of that during the .org bidding, but
for now it is in Oracle's interest not to call attention to PostgreSQL.
The last thing they want is publicity for the project. We may be a harder
target to hurt than MySQL, but we are a target, make no mistake about it.
I'm sure PostgreSQL is on the radar of Sybase, Microsoft, and IBM as well.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200510170838
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFDU5wKvJuQZxSWSsgRAryKAKCkK1+4raUv0MOr/TaFOJoV6Vm9sACfXHDC
fRH5+YBEVRQzih/yQYr6Su4=
=AX08
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2005-10-17 13:45:37 | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
Previous Message | Joshua Kramer | 2005-10-17 12:32:48 | Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Armbrust | 2005-10-17 13:34:17 | Re: fine tuned database dump/reload? |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2005-10-17 12:32:24 | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |