Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations

From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
To: Alexander Staubo <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
Date: 2006-12-12 15:58:21
Message-ID: 457ED19D.7050301@boreham.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Alexander Staubo wrote:

> No, fsync=on. The tps values are similarly unstable with fsync=off,
> though -- I'm seeing bursts of high tps values followed by low-tps
> valleys, a kind of staccato flow indicative of a write caching being
> filled up and flushed.

Databases with checkpointing typically exhibit this cyclical throughput
syndrome.
(put another way : this is to be expected and you are correct that it
indicates buffered
data being flushed to disk periodically).

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2006-12-12 16:08:14 Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
Previous Message Daniel van Ham Colchete 2006-12-12 15:57:20 Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations