Re: Preserving Cluster-Wise Data

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo(at)ttnet(dot)net(dot)tr>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Preserving Cluster-Wise Data
Date: 2006-12-05 18:06:18
Message-ID: 4575B51A.9070709@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was taking a look at _SHARED variable implementation of different
> PLs and it looks like every PL implements its own ad-hoc method to
> preserve cluster-wise data. Wouldn't it be beneficial to have a
> cluster-wise table (sytem catalog?) which is accessible by any
> procedure with required (superuser?) privileges? With such a table,
> procedures (and PLs) will be able to preserve their state data
> natively without need of any ad-hoc method and because of we're using
> a just yet another plain table, all of the MVCC related stuff will be
> handled by PostgreSQL easily.
>
>

The data might well be PL and session specific, though. e.g. a perl
function ref would be both.

I don't know what state we would want to preserve across sessions anyway.

Let's see a use case that a plain user level table wouldn't serve.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2006-12-05 18:06:35 Re: Weak passwords and brute force attacks
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2006-12-05 17:59:54 Re: old synchronized scan patch