Re: fatal error on 8.1 server

From: Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fatal error on 8.1 server
Date: 2006-12-03 03:20:13
Message-ID: 4572426D.5000203@pws.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
>> Tony Caduto wrote:
>>
>>> I did not have autovacuum turned on and I usually do a vacuumdb -z -a -f
>>> -q each night but this one slipped through the cracks :-(
>>>
>
>
>> Strange -- autovacuum should have started an automatic database-wide
>> vacuum on that database, even if disabled.
>>
>
> We only added that in 8.2, no? 8.1 autovacuum would have forced the
> vacuum to occur, but only if it was enabled in postgresql.conf.
>
And in 8.2 it's only a per table vacuum that is required. Is that
correct too?
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrus 2006-12-03 09:40:05 How to use different lc_collate nad lc_ctype settings.
Previous Message Shane Ambler 2006-12-03 02:49:04 Re: named cache