Re: xml2 still essential for us

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: greg(at)ngender(dot)net
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lynn Dobbs <lynn(at)creditlink(dot)com>
Subject: Re: xml2 still essential for us
Date: 2010-01-13 05:34:40
Message-ID: 4572.1263360880@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"J. Greg Davidson" <greg(at)ngender(dot)net> writes:
> (4) In conclusion, I hope that PostgreSQL will keep xml2
> or something similar even when the XSLT and speculative parsing
> issues have been addressed.

Are you sufficiently excited about it to fix its memory management
issues?
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4A6A276A.6090405@dunslane.net
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-09/msg00359.php

If we're going to keep it, it needs significant work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-01-13 06:07:52 Re: lock_timeout GUC patch
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-01-13 05:34:26 Re: Streaming replication status