| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues |
| Date: | 2006-11-26 17:07:57 |
| Message-ID: | 4569C9ED.8090001@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> This has been sort of a weird beta period, because it's the first one
> we've had where cleaning up portability problems has been a complete
> non-issue. The buildfarm has changed the rules of the game that way.
> Previously we've always had to allocate a fair amount of time for
> getting and dealing with port reports, but I don't think we need to
> do that anymore.
>
Isn't it nice when one's children outperform the intentions,
expectations and hopes one held for them? ;-)
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-26 17:14:36 | Re: [PATCHES] Avg performance for int8/numeric |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-26 16:51:59 | Re: "Optional ident" authentication |