Re: RC1 blocker issues

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: RC1 blocker issues
Date: 2006-11-24 23:19:10
Message-ID: 45677DEE.2090903@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> * possible rearrangement of pg_stat column order:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00643.php
>> Should we do this, and if so should we force initdb (via a catversion
>> change)? I'm currently leaning to the thought that if we change it
>> we should force initdb, else we'll risk having a noticeable user-visible
>> difference between different "8.2" installations.
>
> Actually, on looking closer, we *must* force initdb because this changes
> the expected output for the rules regression test.
>
> So, yea or nay? I'm working up the patch right now, but will hold off
> applying until I hear some comments.

I would like to see it changed - even late into the beta cycle ...

Stefan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-24 23:20:23 Re: Day and month name localization uses wrong
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-24 22:25:58 Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues