Re:

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Serodio <daniel(at)checkforte(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>, PostgreSQL JDBC List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:
Date: 2002-11-06 00:09:56
Message-ID: 4566.1036541396@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Daniel Serodio <daniel(at)checkforte(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> Well, at least in this particular situation, the backed raises a NOTICE
> "current transaction is aborted, queries ignored until end of
> transaction block". Maybe the driver can use this notice to give a more
> meaningful exception message?

FYI, that NOTICE condition is changed to an ERROR as of 7.3, so you
can't miss it ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: at 2002-11-05 17:37:38 from Daniel Serodio

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-11-06 00:11:09 Re:
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2002-11-05 21:41:15 Re: