From: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)007Marketing(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper' |
Date: | 2006-11-22 17:42:14 |
Message-ID: | 45648BF6.5050500@bluegap.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> PostgreSQL doesn't ship a integrated replication solution, BECAUSE not
> any one replication solution can fit the need.
Yes, that's what I'm saying.
Please do not mix cause and effect: no replication solution got into
core because none fit all the needs. It's not that we have a policy
stating that we don't want any replication solution in core. What could
possibly be the reasons for such a policy?
Regards
Markus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2006-11-22 17:50:58 | Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper' |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-11-22 17:30:54 | Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper' |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2006-11-22 17:50:58 | Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper' |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-11-22 17:30:54 | Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper' |