Re: Slow SELECT on three or more clients

From: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
To: "AMIR FRANCO D(dot) JOVEN" <amir(at)digi(dot)ph>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slow SELECT on three or more clients
Date: 2006-11-15 14:47:04
Message-ID: 455B2868.7010303@logix-tt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi, Amir,

AMIR FRANCO D. JOVEN wrote:

> My current project uses PostgreSQL 7.3.4.

By all means, please upgrade.

The newest 7.3 series version is 7.3.16, which fixes lots of critical
bugs, and can be used as a drop-in replacement for 7.3.4 (see Release
Notes at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/interactive/release.html )

The newest stable release is 8.1.5, and 8.2 is just on the roads...

> I have a table with 94 fields and a select with only one resultset in
> only one client consumes about 0.86 seconds.

"with only on resultset"?

You mean "with only one returned row", I presume.

Each SELECT has exactly one resultset, which can contain zero to many rows.

Please check the following:

- Did you create the appropriate indices?

- Version 7.3.X may suffer from index bloat, so REINDEX might help.

- Did you VACUUM and ANALYZE the table properly?

- Is your free space map setting, the statistics targets, and other
config options tuned to fit your environment?

- Maybe a VACUUM FULL or a CLUSTER command may help you.

> for a single select with one field in one resultset, is 0.86 seconds normal?

That depends on the circumstances.

Markus

--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig A. James 2006-11-15 16:31:42 Hundreds of database and FSM
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2006-11-15 14:17:42 Re: Slow SELECT on three or more clients