Re: Mistyped message severity

From: Олег Самойлов <splarv(at)ya(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Mistyped message severity
Date: 2018-12-26 17:37:04
Message-ID: 4557EA65-0144-4B51-849C-411613096B42@ya.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Very interesting. I think the same for LOG and log messages? IMHO, it’s worth to add to the documentation.

> 26 дек. 2018 г., в 20:31, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> написал(а):
>
> =?utf-8?q?PG_Doc_comments_form?= <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> Obviously wrongly pointed that for log messages a valid value is "INFO", but
>> not "LOG" and for client messages a valid value is "LOG", but not "INFO".
>> According to the description this must be quite the contrary. And, btw,
>> client_min_messages accept both value.
>
> I don't see anything particularly wrong here. The reason INFO is not
> listed for client_min_messages is that it's not a useful setting:
> INFO messages will be transmitted to the client regardless of what
> client_min_messages is set to.
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2018-12-27 10:53:18 Re: tickling the lesser contributor's withering ego
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-12-26 17:31:29 Re: Mistyped message severity