| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY) |
| Date: | 2009-08-12 05:00:54 |
| Message-ID: | 4554.1250053254@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> The reason this is like this is that the indent binary modifies the
> prototype exactly like the function definition, and then the awk program
> that's used in the pipeline "pulls up" the second line:
> # Move prototype names to the same line as return type. Useful for ctags.
> # Indent should do this, but it does not. It formats prototypes just
> # like real functions.
> In this day and age there's probably no reason to do this.
Um, sorry, no reason to do which?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-08-12 13:26:29 | Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY) |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-08-12 04:54:40 | Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Torsten Zühlsdorff | 2009-08-12 06:48:45 | Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-12 04:58:29 | Re: TODO: fix priority of ordering of read and write light-weight locks |