Re: plperl/plperlu interaction

From: Mark Dilger <pgsql(at)markdilger(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: plperl/plperlu interaction
Date: 2006-11-09 22:41:35
Message-ID: 4553AE9F.9090501@markdilger.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Anyway, it is probably not expected by many users that loading a module
>> in plperlu makes it available to plperl - I was slightly surprised
>> myself to see it work and I am probably more aware than most of perl and
>> plperl subtleties.
>
> I think that is a bug and needs to be fixed. We have the precedent of
> pltcl, which uses separate interpreters for pltcl and pltclu for exactly
> this reason.

If this is fixed, what becomes the mechanism for an administrator to make a perl
module available to plperl functions? I didn't see any other way to do this
documented. Thanks,

mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-11-09 22:44:57 Re: Frequent Update Project: Design Overview of HOTUpdates
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2006-11-09 21:47:22 Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent Update Optimization