From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | plperl fix issues |
Date: | 2006-11-04 20:20:56 |
Message-ID: | 454CF628.6060004@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I am working on the changes necesssary to fix the plperl issue raised a
week or so ago. I have code that can detect if we can safely run two
interpreters. However, things are complicated by the fact that plperl.c
uses a couple of perl hashes to store data: plperl_proc_hash and
plperl_query_hash. The complication arises because we would need to keep
switching perl contexts in order to access them. Rather than add this
complication I am tempted to replace them with standard postgres
dynahashes. Can anyone see any objection?
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-04 22:53:21 | Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-11-04 20:04:51 | buildfarm project changes |