| From: | "Peter Koczan" <pjkoczan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Anyone using a SAN? |
| Date: | 2008-02-14 04:17:56 |
| Message-ID: | 4544e0330802132017n4763babeuc67665bed099cee9@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Thanks for all your input, it is very helpful. A SAN for our postgres
deployment is probably sufficient in terms of performance, because we
just don't have that much data. I'm a little concerned about needs for
user and research databases, but if a project needs a big, fast
database, it might be wise to have them shell out for DAS.
My co-workers and I are meeting with a vendor in two weeks (3Par,
specifically), and I think I have a better idea of what I should be
looking at. I'll keep you all up on the situation. Keep the ideas
coming as I still would like to know of any other important factors.
Thanks again.
Peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2008-02-14 10:12:36 | Re: Anyone using a SAN? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-02-14 03:23:04 | Re: Anyone using a SAN? |