| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plperl/plperlu interaction |
| Date: | 2006-10-26 18:57:09 |
| Message-ID: | 45410505.8080502@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Anyway, it is probably not expected by many users that loading a module
>> in plperlu makes it available to plperl - I was slightly surprised
>> myself to see it work and I am probably more aware than most of perl and
>> plperl subtleties.
>>
>
> I think that is a bug and needs to be fixed. We have the precedent of
> pltcl, which uses separate interpreters for pltcl and pltclu for exactly
> this reason.
>
>
Fair enough.
I am not sure what our release timetable is - and presumably this should
also be backpatched if we regard it as a bug. I won't be able to do much
on this front for the next 2 weeks at least.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2006-10-26 19:06:13 | Re: Replication documentation addition |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-26 18:32:07 | Re: GUC description cleanup |