| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Incorrect behavior with CE and ORDER BY |
| Date: | 2006-10-24 17:46:23 |
| Message-ID: | 453E516F.1070506@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> We have a problem with CE that I want to verify is either expected
>> behavior, a bug or something else :).
>
> Uh, what's your problem exactly? The example only seems to demonstrate
> that if you don't ask for a sort, you don't get one.
Sorry. The problem is, if I ask for an ORDER BY it scans all partitions
versus only scanning the partition that has the data in it.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-10-24 17:47:34 | Re: Incorrect behavior with CE and ORDER BY |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-10-24 17:31:03 | Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8 |