| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Is ODBC that slow? |
| Date: | 2006-10-21 03:39:17 |
| Message-ID: | 45399665.8020505@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>> > ODBC is often blamed for this sort of thing - I have the 8.01.02
>> release
>> > dated 2006.01.31. Everything appears to be at its default setting.
>>
>> Try Command Prompt's ODBC driver. Lately it has been measured to be
>> consistently faster than psqlODBC.
I should note that we need to get a build out for Windows for rev 80.
Rev 80 is the one the build showing the most promise on Linux32 and 64
bit. It is also the one that reflects the performance metrics we have
been seeing.
We should have that in a week or so.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-21 03:40:12 | Re: Is ODBC that slow? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-21 03:30:32 | Re: Slow functional indexes? |